SEPTA Strike

Being a resident of Philadelphia for the past week has been a living hell for some people. Thankfully, all of that came to an end early this morning when the SEPTA strike was finally resolved. While I live close enough to Temple that I can walk to my classes, I was lucky that I didn't feel the full force of the strike like many others in the area. About 800,000 people were impacted by this DAILY.

Apparently, there was a big disagreement over wages and benefits. According to the Examiner, they reached a new 5 year deal. Workers get no pay raise the first year, then a 2.5% increase in year 2 and then a 3% increase for the rest of the years. This deal was apparently the same deal proposed to the union a week earlier. It's been suggested that mounting public dissent and pressure forced them into action.I find it hard to sympathize with SEPTA workers, where people earn up to 24 bucks an hour for driving a bus around.

I'm aware we live in America and that we all have certain rights, but the SEPTA Union totally abused their power. They crippled an entire city for nearly a week, making it impossible for some kids to get to their schools or others to get to work. What's going to happen after this deal runs its course? Is Philadelphia going to have another strike on its hands? It's looking like we're just going to have to cross our fingers and hope for the best.

New York City has what they call the Taylor Law. It prevents strikes by the workers of the transit system. People who strike in New York are able to be punished be either jail time and/or fines. They are still able to work out their contract disputes, but the system remains in business for the sake of the city.

Why can't Philadelphia institute such a law of their own? It would make life so much easier for so many people. I can't see how it doesn't help everyone: workers can still settle contract disputes and people can still get to where they need to go to maintain their living. Philadelphia was falling to pieces: Fires erupted on a train, a worker was ran over by a train, and people couldn't get to their jobs/classes.

Verdict? Speaking from the general public who had to suffer through this all: UNJUSTIFIABLE. Even though everything is back up and running, I'm going to do everything I can to not use SEPTA anymore. I don't want them having any of my money.

VERDICT: UNJUSTIFIABLE

Slutty Halloween Costumes

Now I know I'm several days late with this one, but I got caught up in a bunch of other work and this has kind of hit the wayside. Never fear, faithful readers! It's only temporary, my goal is to update this at the very least once a week. Just with exams, homework, maintaining another blog that I swore to myself I would update daily ( Wreck On Her, ever hear of it? You should check it out here), Justification Station just was on the back-burner for a little bit. After all, I am a college student. I don't want to just sloppily update this because I enjoy these issues, And I like taking my time with these.

So with that being said, hike up your mini skirts, re-adjust your corsets, straighten out your fishnets, and get ready to tackle this very serious subject: Women's Halloween costumes. Not just any Halloween costumes, but the ones where they expose as much of themselves as possible without being arrested for indecent exposure. You know what I'm talking about. But in case you don't...

Now I know exactly what you're thinking. "IAN!? You look at dirty halloween costumes!?" The answer, of course, is no. This just demonstrates how ingrained it is in our world that women's halloween costumes have to be as promiscuous as possible. These images, among many others, popped up after a simple Google Image search of "Women's Halloween Costumes" (image credit: scavangeinc).

This is a tough topic for me to discuss without any bias, since, as a man, I think Halloween outfits can be among the most flattering a girl can wear. However, it makes whoever is wearing these outfits LOOK bad, as in people think "Jesus Christ, why would you ever go out in public looking like that, you slut."

But I take pride in the fact that while most guys are just ogling at these women and not thinking anything about it, I at least am trying to figure out whether this is really justifiable or not. I have now experienced two Halloweens here at Temple, and everytime I see a pack of girls walk by in their costumes, I always question their integrity.

Are they doing it because they know they look good? Because they want to think they look good? Because they want attention? Because everyone else is doing it and they're expected to? Are they going to regret this 20 years from now looking back on it? Etc, etc.

I like to believe that girls go into this knowing that they're going to look and be perceived as a slut, but they go ahead and do it anyway. After all, Halloween is the only holiday where girls can look like sluts and get away with it according to Mean Girls. Women aren't going to look back on this and regret it. If anything, they're probably going to regret NOT doing it because college/early adulthood was the only time they could possibly get away with wearing something like what you see above. In comparison to some men's halloween costumes (another topic altogether), women's costumes are considerably less vulgar, but clearly far more suggestive.

So are these costumes justifiable? If the girls wearing them are aware of how they are being perceived and are doing it anyway just to have a good time: yes, it's totally justifiable. If someone wears them out of blind ignorance and thinks they look awesome (which is what I feel like most people who wear these outfits think): no, not justifiable at all. It's very circumstantial.

VERDICT: CIRCUMSTANTIAL/ MOSTLY UNJUSTIFIABLE

*disclaimer*

I really didn't want to have to say this, but I'm going to anyway so that my ass is covered: I know that not everyone dresses like this. Some pull of very cute and fun outfits that are in no way promiscuous, but the thing is, I'm not judging whether or not that's justifiable, because it's safe to say that the consensus of that argument would be "yes, cute and fun outfits that are in no way promiscuous are justifiable." Right? Right.